Pigeon pea

Research papers concerning agrohomeopathy, homeopathy (if relevant), potentised BD remedies and so forth.
Site Admin
Posts: 919
Joined: 12 Jan 2006, 11:26
Location: Forest of Dean, UK

Pigeon pea

Post by Mark »

New homeopathic potencies promote plant growth and development.

Sukul S, Sukul NC, Mondal S, Sukul A.

: The extensive use of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer in agriculture is
causing environmental damage, organic crops contain significantly more vitamin C,
iron, magnesium and phosphorus and significantly less nitrates than conventional
crops. In this situation it is desirable to find out suitable agents, which would increase
plant growth without compromising with the quality of food and of soil. We have
studied that potentized growth retardants, chlorocholine chloride CCC (2-
chloroethyle trimethyl ammonium chloride) and maleic hydrazide, MH (1, 2-dihydro
3,6 pyridazinedin) can promote growth in pigeon pea Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp;
Lady’s finger, Abelmoschus aeculentus (L) Moench; cow pea, Vigna unguculata L.
and in rice, Oryza sativa L. The aim of this work is to see if plant growth inhibitors
serve as growth promoters at their ultra low doses .
Methods: We have selected two plant growth retardants viz., chlorocholine chloride
CCC (2-chloroethyle trimethyl ammonium chloride) and maleic hydrazide, MH (1, 2-
dihydro 3, 6 pyridazinedin). Then we prepared 30th potency of them and also 200th
potency for CCC. Samples of CCC and MH were mixed separately with 90% ethanol
at 1mg/ml and designated as mother tincture (MT). Each MT was diluted with 90%
ethanol and succussed 10 times to prepare the 1st centesimal potency. In this way
the 30th potency of two drugs and 200th potency of CCC was prepared. The controls
ethanol 30th and 200th potency were prepared by succussion 90% ethanol 10 times
and treated as 1st potency. Then mix 90% succussed ethanol with 90% ethanol in
1:100 and succussed, thus prepared 2nd centicimal potency. Likewise 30th and
200th potency of 90% ethanol were prepared. The 30th potency of CCC and MH and
200th potency of CCC were treated on 15 days old pigeon pea, Cajanus cajan (L.)
Millsp grouped in four rows each with twenty pots. Just before drug application, each
potency was diluted with sterile water 1:500 and applied by foliar spray. The
treatment was repeated on days 16, 17, 18, 21, 27, 33 and 42. Data were collected
on day 75. Morphometric data such as plant height, number of branches, number of
leaves/plant, root length and number of flower/plant were recorded. Biochemical
parameters like total chlorophyll, sugar, carbohydrate and protein were assessed.
The same experiments with CCC30c, CCC200c and MH 30c repeated on Lady’s
finger, Abelmoschus aeculentus (L) Moench. Here foliar spray of drugs in dilution of
1:500 ware done on day 12 and 13. Data were collected on day 75. Morphometric
data like shoot length, shoot girth, shoot weight, root length, root girth, root weight,
number of leaves/plant, average leaf area, leaf weight and leaf water content were
taken. Total leaf chlorophyll, protein and soluble and insoluble sugar were also
estimated. The 30th potency of MH and CCC were treated on cow pea, Vigna
unguculata L. in 1:500 dilution by gently touch on both sides of leaf. The treatments
were repeated twice after 15 days interval and final data were collected. Number of
leaves/plant was recorded. Total leaf chlorophyll and protein estimated. Fast protein
liquid chromatography (FPLC) was also done with the leaf material. 200th potency of
CCC was sprayed on two rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties viz., IET 4786-SHATABDI
and IET 4094-KHITISH at Rice Research Station, Chinsurah. The drug was diluted
1:100 with distilled water and sprayed twice at fifteen days interval. Total leaf
chlorophyll, protein, soluble sugar and carbohydrate were estimated. Panicle length,
fertile grain percentage, number of tillers/plant, plant length and productivity /hectare
were recorded. All statistical analyses were done by analysis of variance (ANOVA)
followed by student –test.
Results: In all the cases significant increase in morphometric as well as biochemical
parameters were observed. In pigeon pea MH30c showed comparatively poor
performance in the growth promoting effect than the potentized CCC. In Lady’s
finger all the potentized drugs produced significant improvement in plant growth and
increased significantly water, chlorophyll and protein content in leaves. The FPLC
study of cow pea leaf protein revealed that CCC 30c induced expression of some
new proteins which might have played a role in growth and development of the plant.
CCC200c significantly increased yields in rice under field conditions.

Discussion: CCC in material doses inhibits the activity of the enzyme kaurene
synthetase in the gibberellin (GA) biosynthesis pathway, resulting reduction in
gibberellin formation. Potentized CCC has produced just the opposite effect and
promotes the activity of the enzyme, resulting in increased biosynthesis of GA. As
gibberellic acid biosynthesis pathway influenced chlorophyll and protein biosynthesis
pathways, that is why total leaf chlorophyll and sugar and protein also increased in
treated plants. GA also promotes floral initiation, sex determination and setting of
fruit in plants, thus rice productivity was increased with CCC200c. MH in material
doses acts as an inhibitor of the synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins as expected
MH30c produced the opposite effect and enhanced nucleic acid synthesis and
protein synthesis. Thus results to promote plant growth and development. These
growth retardants in potentized forms increased photosynthesis and may help in
carbon sequestration. Thereby indirectly they also help to lowering global warming
and keep environment pollution free, in addition to reduce the application of fertilizers
and maintaining soil ecosystem.